release: 0.107.0 - #173
Merged
Merged
release: 0.107.0#173
Conversation
Stainless-Generated-From: 9598a45cc204663dc64d611c88b0a7a457b642f0
Contributor
Author
|
🧪 Testing To try out this version of the SDK: Expires at: Fri, 16 Oct 2026 18:35:54 GMT |
kernel-internal
Bot
force-pushed
the
release-please--branches--main--changes--next
branch
from
September 16, 2026 17:54
c10a2b1 to
b239625
Compare
Stainless-Generated-From: 1422c8f3402ddd8a238fda63746dda102aa53937
stainless-app
Bot
force-pushed
the
release-please--branches--main--changes--next
branch
from
September 16, 2026 18:14
b239625 to
0080003
Compare
kernel-internal
Bot
force-pushed
the
release-please--branches--main--changes--next
branch
from
September 16, 2026 18:15
0080003 to
6740eb7
Compare
Stainless-Generated-From: 89ffaef01313311d22f91e6eba840096c085be85
stainless-app
Bot
force-pushed
the
release-please--branches--main--changes--next
branch
from
September 16, 2026 18:35
6740eb7 to
ad83a0b
Compare
kernel-internal
Bot
force-pushed
the
release-please--branches--main--changes--next
branch
from
September 16, 2026 18:36
ad83a0b to
7c83d87
Compare
rgarcia
approved these changes
Sep 16, 2026
rgarcia
left a comment
rgarcia
left a comment
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Reviewed Browser REPL generation and release contents. Approved for release.
Contributor
|
🤖 Release is at https://github.com/kernel/kernel-python-sdk/releases/tag/v0.107.0 🌻 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Automated Release PR
0.107.0 (2026-09-16)
Features
This pull request is managed by Stainless's GitHub App.
The semver version number is based on included commit messages. Alternatively, you can manually set the version number in the title of this pull request.
For a better experience, it is recommended to use either rebase-merge or squash-merge when merging this pull request.
🔗 Stainless website
📚 Read the docs
🙋 Reach out for help or questions
Note
Medium Risk
Adds unsandboxed in-VM code execution via Browser REPL and updates payment authorize error semantics that integrators must handle correctly.
Overview
Release 0.107.0 bumps package/version metadata and documents three API-facing changes in the generated SDK.
The main addition is
client.browsers.repl, which POSTs to/browsers/{id_or_name}/repland runs JavaScript in a persistent Node.js REPL inside the browser VM (code, optionalreset,timeout_sec). Sync/async clients plus raw/streaming wrappers are wired up, with new types for params/results and ordered text/image output (BrowserReplResult,BrowserReplContent, etc.).Config registry
NoRecommendation.codenow includestarget_not_evaluableso unevaluable lookup targets are classified explicitly.Vault Link card docs/types note a 50,000 minor-unit spend cap, and
perform_operationdocstrings describe updated Link authorize behavior: non-retryable spend-request failures delete the card and return provider errors; 429 rate limits keep the item and should be retried after backoff.Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 7c83d87. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.