feat(storage): support Jindo for OSS scan planning

[XiaoHongbo-Hope]

Purpose

Add an opt-in, read-only JindoSDK backend for OSS scans. OpenDAL remains the default. PyPaimon can select it for native planning through apache/paimon#9124.

Changes

• add the optional storage-jindo feature, selected with fs.oss.impl=jindo
• dynamically load an installed JindoSDK without bundling its binary
• preserve HTTP/HTTPS endpoint protocol when adapting Jindo configuration
• support stat, paginated list, and ranged/full reads
• fetch list pages on demand and convert Jindo list exceptions into Rust errors
• initialize lazily and run blocking SDK calls on Tokio blocking workers
• reject unsupported write operations explicitly

Benchmark

Release-mode, partition-filtered planning on two fixed OSS-backed snapshots. Both backends ran on the same host with identical predicates, in reversed order and two independent processes per backend.

Workload	Planned scale	OpenDAL warm median	Jindo warm median
A	~281k files	1.55s	1.25s
B	~37k files / ~27k splits	5.92s	2.19s

Both backends produced matching snapshot, split, file-count, and planned-byte results. This measures scan planning, not data throughput. Request count and peak OSS QPS were not measured.

Validation

• 6 Jindo storage tests and Python SDK discovery test
• default OSS and storage-jindo builds
• Clippy, formatting, dependency report, and diff checks
• read-only OSS REST-catalog test covering snapshot listing, planning, and row reading
• JindoSDK 6.10.4 local OSS-protocol probes: HTTPS emits TLS, list exceptions return errors, three-page listing is complete, and consuming one entry does not request later pages

Notes

No JindoSDK binary is packaged. Selecting Jindo without the feature or a loadable SDK returns a configuration error. A FileIO configured with Jindo rejects writes, deletes, renames, and copies.

[JingsongLi]

Have you compared Jindo and OpenDAL? What are the differences? (benchmark)

[XiaoHongbo-Hope]

Have you compared Jindo and OpenDAL? What are the differences? (benchmark)

yes, I did a test, Jindo performance is a little better, but there is a lot of qps issue during my testing, so may need another testing. And, I think this PR is best to have, not very urgent now. Because qps issue is addressed in other way.

[XiaoHongbo-Hope]

Have you compared Jindo and OpenDAL? What are the differences? (benchmark)

I updated the performance result in PR descrption.

[QuakeWang]

LGTM