Skip to content

feature/CSTACKEX-310: implement all method for ontap iscsi adapter - #105

Merged
piyush5netapp merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
feature/CSTACKEX-310
Oct 1, 2026
Merged

piyush5netapp merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
feature/CSTACKEX-310

Conversation

@piyush5netapp

@piyush5netapp piyush5netapp commented Sep 17, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

…d removed changes from common iscsiadmstorageadpater

Description

This PR...

Types of changes

  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • Enhancement (improves an existing feature and functionality)
  • Cleanup (Code refactoring and cleanup, that may add test cases)
  • Build/CI
  • Test (unit or integration test code)

Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity

Feature/Enhancement Scale

  • Major
  • Minor

Bug Severity

  • BLOCKER
  • Critical
  • Major
  • Minor
  • Trivial

Screenshots (if appropriate):

How Has This Been Tested?

Tested happy path testing in ubunut VM. All workflows working fine.
Create zone->Pod-> Cluster->Host->Primary Storage->Secondary Storage.

iSCSI

Create Storage Pool - PASS

Create disk and compute offering for the storage pool using only the tag. - PASS

Create VM instance using the same disk and compute offering. - PASS

Power Off the VM. - PASS

Power on the VM on the same host again. - PASS

Destroy the VM without expunge and no data volume selected. - PASS

Attach the disk/volume to a already running VM. - PASS

Detach the disk/volume from a running VM. - PASS

Destroy the volume without expunge. - PASS

Recover the destroyed volume again. - PASS

Destroy the VM without expunge and all data volume selected.- PASS

Destroy the VM with expunge and all data volume selected.- PASS

Take instance snapshot without quiesce and without memory.- PASS

How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?

…d removed changes from common iscsiadmstorageadpater
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔴 Test Coverage Grade: D — Marginal

Metric Value
Line coverage 24.73%
Branch coverage 18.86%

Grade Scale

Grade Line Coverage Meaning
🟢 A ≥ 80% Excellent - this code sleeps well at night 😴
🟡 B 60-79% Good - almost there, don't stop now 😉
🟠 C 40-59% Acceptable - your code is wearing a seatbelt, but no airbags 😬
🔴 D 20-39% Marginal - boldly shipping where no test has gone before 🖖
⛔ F < 20% Failing - tests? what tests? 🔥

Branch coverage is shown as a secondary signal. Grade is determined by line coverage.
View full Actions run

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔴 Test Coverage Grade: D — Marginal

Metric Value
Line coverage 24.73%
Branch coverage 18.87%

Grade Scale

Grade Line Coverage Meaning
🟢 A ≥ 80% Excellent - this code sleeps well at night 😴
🟡 B 60-79% Good - almost there, don't stop now 😉
🟠 C 40-59% Acceptable - your code is wearing a seatbelt, but no airbags 😬
🔴 D 20-39% Marginal - boldly shipping where no test has gone before 🖖
⛔ F < 20% Failing - tests? what tests? 🔥

Branch coverage is shown as a secondary signal. Grade is determined by line coverage.
View full Actions run

@rajiv-jain-netapp rajiv-jain-netapp left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can you add testing results

@piyush5netapp

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

can you add testing results

@rajiv-jain-netapp Testing result are added in description. Oracle linux is not tested for this change as its copy paste changes.

@piyush5netapp
piyush5netapp merged commit a463f96 into main Oct 1, 2026
12 checks passed
@piyush5netapp piyush5netapp added the to-be-cherry-picked-for-upstream This PR needs to be cherry picked for next upstream PR label Oct 1, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

to-be-cherry-picked-for-upstream This PR needs to be cherry picked for next upstream PR

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants