Skip to content

docs: migrate documentation to Dockle - #148

Open
ReenigneArcher wants to merge 20 commits into
masterfrom
docs/migrate-to-dockle
Open

ReenigneArcher wants to merge 20 commits into
masterfrom
docs/migrate-to-dockle

Conversation

@ReenigneArcher

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Description

Migrate docs to Dockle.

Screenshot

Issues Fixed or Closed

Roadmap Issues

Type of Change

  • feat: New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • fix: Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • docs: Documentation only changes
  • style: Changes that do not affect the meaning of the code (white-space, formatting, missing semicolons, etc.)
  • refactor: Code change that neither fixes a bug nor adds a feature
  • perf: Code change that improves performance
  • test: Adding missing tests or correcting existing tests
  • build: Changes that affect the build system or external dependencies
  • ci: Changes to CI configuration files and scripts
  • chore: Other changes that don't modify src or test files
  • revert: Reverts a previous commit
  • BREAKING CHANGE: Introduces a breaking change (can be combined with any type above)

Checklist

  • Code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • Code has been self-reviewed
  • Code has been commented, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • Code docstring/documentation-blocks for new or existing methods/components have been added or updated
  • Unit tests have been added or updated for any new or modified functionality

AI Usage

See our AI usage policy.

  • None: No AI tools were used in creating this PR
  • Light: AI provided minor assistance (formatting, simple suggestions)
  • Moderate: AI helped with code generation or debugging specific parts
  • Heavy: AI generated most or all of the code changes

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Sep 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 73.99%. Comparing base (2507ce1) to head (34c4d82).
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #148      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   73.92%   73.99%   +0.06%     
==========================================
  Files          40       40              
  Lines       10085    10085              
  Branches     3536     3536              
==========================================
+ Hits         7455     7462       +7     
- Misses       1957     1961       +4     
+ Partials      673      662      -11     
Flag Coverage Δ
FreeBSD 52.49% <ø> (ø)
Linux-Clang 55.40% <ø> (+0.01%) ⬆️
Linux-GCC 66.13% <ø> (ø)
PowerShell 75.60% <ø> (ø)
Windows-MSVC 88.63% <ø> (+0.11%) ⬆️
Windows-MinGW-UCRT64 63.61% <ø> (+0.15%) ⬆️
macOS 49.13% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
see 5 files with indirect coverage changes


Continue to review full report in Codecov by Harness.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 2507ce1...34c4d82. Read the comment docs.

@ReenigneArcher
ReenigneArcher marked this pull request as ready for review September 20, 2026 03:22
@sonarqubecloud

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant