Skip to content

Removed quorum for cloud spending presentation votes - #299

Draft
DeadPixelPro wants to merge 2 commits into
ComputerScienceHouse:masterfrom
DeadPixelPro:master
Draft

DeadPixelPro wants to merge 2 commits into
ComputerScienceHouse:masterfrom
DeadPixelPro:master

Conversation

@DeadPixelPro

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

We do not track quorum for cloud expenditures.

Check one:

  • Semantic Change: something about the meaning of the text is different
  • Non-semantic Change: Spelling, grammar, or formatting changes.

Summary of change(s):
Removed the fifty percent quorum requirement for spending presentations that pull from "the cloud." We do not currently track quorum for this, and no other spending presentation requires a quorum.

(spotted by @pikachu0542)

We do not track quorum for cloud expenditures.

@pikachu0542 pikachu0542 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@pikachu0542

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Just for reference, spending presentations from a directorship budget do not require a quorum

@DeadPixelPro

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

While I'm here, I should probably add something. All this currently does is make this more in line with how things currently go, but considering that a lot can be done with an expenditure like this, I think it would make a lot of sense if we instead modify this so that cloud expenditures above a certain amount require a quorum.

@shaeespring shaeespring added Ballot Pending Discussion has occurred, but ballots have yet to be issued and removed Needs Discussion labels Aug 28, 2026
@DeadPixelPro
DeadPixelPro marked this pull request as draft August 30, 2026 16:25
@shaeespring shaeespring removed the Ballot Pending Discussion has occurred, but ballots have yet to be issued label Sep 9, 2026
@shaeespring

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@DeadPixelPro Are you still interested in working on this PR? I know this week has been busy what with career fair and all, but if you're no longer interested, I can look into either reassigning the issue or closing it

@DeadPixelPro

DeadPixelPro commented Sep 28, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Yes.... kinda. The current plan is to make cloud spending beyond an amount (maybe $300 to keep things consistent?) require a vote similar to a constitutional amendment vote. I pretty much just have to type that up and rename, but just haven't yet. Though, closing the PR and making a new one would also be valid.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants