[PWGHF] Omega0: Added appropriate kfBachRej pid - #18084
Merged
Merged
Conversation
jinhyunni
requested review from
NicoleBastid,
alibuild,
apalasciano,
deepathoms,
fcatalan92,
fcolamar,
fgrosa,
gluparel,
hahassan7,
jpxrk,
mfaggin,
mmazzilli,
singhra1994,
stefanopolitano,
vkucera,
xinyepeng and
zhangbiao-phy
as code owners
September 29, 2026 06:56
|
O2 linter results: ❌ 0 errors, |
Contributor
|
Thanks @jinhyunni for the fix! The change looks good to me and now the rejected Xi hypothesis makes sense. |
Contributor
Author
|
Thanks for the confirmation @mtorresc15. Hi, @zhangbiao-phy. |
fcatalan92
approved these changes
Sep 30, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR fixes the particle hypothesis used for the rejected cascade mass. For Ω candidates, the bachelor track in kfBachRej is now assigned the pion hypothesis to reconstruct the competing Ξ hypothesis.
@mtorresc15, please have a look and let me know if any further changes are needed regarding this issue.